Home › Tests › Mixed Practice Test › B1 Project Test

B1 Spanish Project Test: Research, Interview and Present

Take a B1 Spanish project test on researching a local issue, interviewing people, organizing evidence and presenting a clear proposal. Use this quiz after the lesson to check understanding and identify anything worth reviewing.

Estimated time: 25 minutes

Read the lesson →

← Previous Next →

Instructions

Complete all sections carefully. Follow the instruction for each question type and choose or enter the best answer.

Read the instructions shown at the start of each section before answering.

Progress 0 of 33 answered

Multiple Choice

Choose the correct answer.

1. What is the central goal of the B1 project?

Describe an entire city without collecting evidence. Memorize a long speech about a public issue. Investigate one limited local issue and present a proposal based on collected information. Prove that one interview represents every resident.

2. Which project question is appropriately limited?

¿Cómo podemos mejorar toda la ciudad? ¿Qué problemas existen en todos los barrios? ¿Qué cambio sencillo podría mejorar el uso del parque del barrio? ¿Cómo podemos resolver todos los problemas públicos?

3. Why should source information remain attached to a background claim?

To make the claim sound more emotional. To hide where the information came from. To show where the information comes from and distinguish it from personal opinion. To make every source equally reliable.

4. Which interview question is open rather than loaded?

¿No crees que necesitamos más papeleras? ¿No sería mejor limpiar el parque cada día? ¿Qué cambio ayudaría a mantener el parque más limpio? ¿Verdad que la zona de juegos está muy sucia?

5. What should you record from a short interview?

Every word exactly. Only the speaker's name. The person's main point. Only information that agrees with your proposal.

6. Why should “Según Lucía” be kept when reporting her view?

Because every sentence needs a person's name. Because Lucía's view is official city policy. Because the statement is attributed to her rather than presented as established fact. Because it proves all residents agree.

7. What does “Dos de las tres personas entrevistadas...” represent?

A universal fact about the whole neighborhood. A citywide statistical survey. A direct summary of a small sample. Proof that the third person disagreed with everything.

8. Why should the presenter state that three interviews are only a small sample?

To make the project seem less organized. To avoid making any proposal. To prevent limited evidence from becoming a universal claim. To show that interview questions were loaded.

9. What makes the sample proposal evidence-based?

It asks for any change the presenter personally prefers. It ignores where the rubbish was reported. It responds to reported rubbish and few bins near the play area. It assumes the presenter controls the city council.

10. Who decides whether the additional bin is actually installed?

The presenter alone. The three interviewees automatically. The group collecting signatures. The city council.

True or False

Decide whether each statement is true or false.

11. The project should investigate one limited local issue.

True False

12. “¿No crees que necesitamos más papeleras?” is recommended as an open interview question.

True False

13. The lesson recommends recording the interviewee's main point rather than every word.

True False

14. An opinion reported by Lucía should automatically be rewritten as an established fact.

True False

15. Two of three interviewees mentioning a problem proves what all neighborhood residents think.

True False

16. A proposal should follow from the information collected.

True False

17. The presenter should claim control over decisions that belong to the city council.

True False

18. If the presenter does not know the cost of a bin, inventing a reasonable amount is better than admitting the information is missing.

True False

Reading

Read the text and answer the question.

Reading passage

Según el horario publicado por el ayuntamiento, el parque cierra a las diez.

19. What makes this a background-information statement rather than an unsupported claim?

It uses the future tense. It names the interviewer. It identifies the published city-council schedule as the source. It includes an opinion about the park.

Reading passage

Lucía dice que usa el parque tres veces por semana y que el principal problema es la basura después del fin de semana.

20. What should the project record from this interview?

Every word Lucía said before and after this sentence. A claim that every resident has the same view. Lucía's main point about frequency of use and rubbish after the weekend. Only the fact that Lucía knows the park.

Reading passage

Carlos comenta que hay suficientes papeleras cerca de la entrada, pero pocas junto a la zona de juegos.

21. Which detail is attributed specifically to Carlos?

The park closes at ten. The city council will install another bin. There are enough bins near the entrance but few by the play area. Everyone wants Monday cleaning.

Reading passage

Dos de las tres personas entrevistadas mencionaron la basura cerca de la zona de juegos.

22. Which interpretation is justified?

All residents think the play area is dirty. No one mentioned another issue. Two people in this small sample mentioned rubbish near the play area. The city council has confirmed the problem.

Reading passage

Propongo pedir una papelera adicional junto a la zona de juegos y revisar la limpieza de esa zona los lunes.

23. Why does this proposal fit the example evidence?

It addresses a problem unrelated to the interviews. It assumes the presenter can install the bin personally. It responds to rubbish near the play area and the reported lack of bins there. It replaces the need to report evidence.

Reading passage

No. No tengo ese dato y tendría que consultarlo con el ayuntamiento.

24. What project principle does this answer demonstrate?

Avoid all audience questions. Give an estimated answer even without evidence. Do not invent missing data; identify what must be checked. Treat opinion as established fact.

Dialogue

Complete the dialogue with the correct answer.

25. Complete the dialogue.

Audience

¿Por qué elegiste esa propuesta?

Presenter

Choose an answer

Complete the dialogue:

Porque responde al problema que mencionaron dos de las tres personas entrevistadas. Porque me gusta cualquier propuesta. Porque toda la ciudad piensa exactamente lo mismo. Porque no recogí información.

26. Complete the dialogue.

Audience

¿Sabes cuánto costaría instalar una papelera?

Presenter

Choose an answer

Complete the dialogue:

No. No tengo ese dato y tendría que consultarlo con el ayuntamiento. Sí, voy a inventar una cifra aproximada. Sí, tres entrevistas demuestran el coste exacto. No importa cuánto cueste.

27. Complete the dialogue.

Interviewer

¿Qué problema notas con más frecuencia?

Resident

Choose an answer

Complete the dialogue:

La basura cerca de la zona de juegos. Sí, claro. No creo que necesitemos entrevistas. Toda la ciudad piensa igual.

28. Complete the dialogue.

Presenter

He hablado con tres personas.

Audience

¿Representan a todo el barrio?

Presenter

Choose an answer

Complete the dialogue:

No. Los resultados representan solo una muestra pequeña. Sí, tres personas representan automáticamente a todos. Sí, porque todas las muestras pequeñas son universales. No hace falta mencionar los límites.